Liberty is Beautiful











Last summer, we were faced with the decision regarding Hospice services for my mother.  Going in, I had little knowledge or experience with Hospice.  Two of my grandparents were on Hospice at the end of their lives, and there was some family turmoil regarding it.  But I was young, living in another city, and either pregnant or had a new baby (they were on Hospice at different times).  The nitty gritty of it all was far removed from my world, though I loved them dearly and tried to be there near the end.  My mom, however, feared Hospice.  She felt they speeded death.  Or allowed family members to speed death.

As the decision approached, an Oncology Nurse at the hospital met with me to explain the differences and see what our goals were.  What I found was that Hospice means different things to different people.  As a doctor told me a few weeks ago, his impression was that Hospice speeds death in a comfortable manner.  He was the first professional to ever say that to me.  In some cases, I believe he is correct.  But back to my discussion with the Oncology Nurse.  Basically, there are two camps of Hospice.  On one side, all medicines are discontinued expect those for pain and nausea regardless of the patient’s terminal condition.  The other camp believes that, while a patient is terminal, life should be as full and as  long as reasonably possible.  In other words, you may have terminal cancer that will take your life 6 months from now, but you shouldn’t die 4 months earlier from a Urinary Tract Infection or have a stroke because you no longer take medicine for your high blood pressure.  To us, one side’s goal was to approach the end quickly and peacefully.  The other’s was to enjoy it to the fullest until the patient was truly at the end.

We opted for a company that was extremely life affirming.  My mother had cancer and heart failure from chemotherapy.  Therefore, we did not treat those conditions.  However, everything that she wanted treatment for, she received treatment.  Pneumonia, Urinary Tract Infections, Dehydration from Infections, High Blood Pressure.  The staff provided us great support and encouragement.  They contracted a physical therapist to train us in how to care for Mom as her abilities changed.  Unfortunately, a time came that my mom became too much for us to handle.  I was failing at the balancing act.  I couldn’t devote enough attention to my husband and children, nor could I devote enough time to her.  She recognized this as well and decided to go into a nursing home.

This is where my title comes in.  While I understood the differences in Hospice philosophies, I did not realize that the bulk of our local medical community had one view of Hospice.  The view contrary to the one we held.

Mom and I had many discussions before she became very ill.  We discussed feeding tubes and ventilators.  Cremation versus burial.  We discussed money and costs.  We discussed dividing her belongings after her death.  We discussed the impact of her end of life and death on her grandchildren.  Should she die in their home?  What if they were to find her?  Should they be present?  The conversations no one wants to have.  She decided not to put these into writing for the simple reason that there are too many contingencies.  Her idea was that she made her wishes clear to me and gave me the legal power to carry them out.

The funny thing is (not really funny), I always envisioned battles between doctors and patients regarding the removal of life support.  In reality, most doctors did not want to provide any care because she was a “Hospice Patient.”  It started with the need for antibiotics for a Urinary Tract Infection.  UTIs in the elderly can be brutal.  It’s not uncommon for a simple infection to cause changes in mental status along with a general shut down of the body.  Then it was the need for a food and hydration source.  The opinion was that since she couldn’t feed herself, she was ready to die.  We were told things like “you’re delaying the inevitable,” an argument that could be used for any life sustaining action.  Eat lunch today?  Well, you’ve just delayed the inevitable.  One doctor said she shouldn’t have any treatment because she hadn’t talked to him in three days.  He went so far as to refer us to a Medical Ethics Committee for the horrendous act of treating her UTI and Sepsis.  And having a feeding tube placed, as it was one of those wishes she had made clear to me.  And for clarification, feeding tubes will not grant you immortality.  If it was truly Mom’s time, she would have died regardless.  Her tube has been in for about a month now.

To admit Mom to the hospital, we had to sever our relationship with Hospice.  We decided not to go back solely because of the predominant view in the local medical community that Hospice patients should have high doses of morphine and anti-nausea medicine to ensure tolerance of the morphine.  I truly miss our Hospice team.  They were loving and compassionate, but we had to do what is best for Mom.

So what have I learned from all this?  In regards to Hospice, it’s important to understand the predominate view even if it conflicts with my own views or even the views of the Hospice provider.  On a larger scale, understanding the cultural connotative meaning of a word or idea outweighs my own understanding of the denotative meaning.  Example: I may know what a Classical Liberal is, but modern culture has a connotative definition of Liberal that is contrary to what I know about Classical Liberalism.  Telling someone that I am a classical liberal does not make me sound conservative, but liberal, regardless of definition.  I wore myself out trying to explain our view of Hospice to every nurse, doctor, therapist, and aid.  In the end, it was a battle that was killing my mom, and I could not accept the collateral damage.  Sometimes it’s best to use language everyone understands.

On a happy note, Mom has made improvements that we were told she would never make.  This is an answer to prayer.  Getting simple treatments proved monumental and impossible at times.  It was miraculous indeed that she was able to be treated at the level she needed.  Also, she is now opening her mouth for food, chewing, and swallowing.  She is moving both arms, one leg, and one foot reflexively (responding to tickling and uncomfortable stretches).  She is answering yes/no questions, though not all the time.  She also mouths things like “I love you” and “Goodbye” when we leave.  The blood clot in her arm seems to have passed with no medications or treatment whatsoever.  She makes facial expressions appropriate to the conversation.  All miracles in my book.  She’s not giving up, and God doesn’t seem ready for her.

If you are ever in need of Hospice Services, I would highly recommend Compassionate Care Hospice.



{December 16, 2010}   College Station City Council Recall

This cartoon was sent to me by someone who wishes to remain anonymous.

From the “author”:

It’s called “Christmas Future”
and she’s (College Station Mayor Nancy Berry) Scrooge mcQuack or whatever
and the image being presented to her is that of “Christmas Future”
and she is asking “Um…is that how it’s really gonna be? Or can we change it?”



{April 27, 2010}   Vote Early and Vote Often

It seems that all we’ve been doing lately is voting.  The Primary.  The runoff for the primary.  Now City Council and School Board Elections.  Its fatiguing and tough to keep up with!

Don’t lose heart.  Get out there and vote again!  And please vote for Jess Fields.  We need a rational, limited-government person on our council. 



How often do we look at our neighbors and think they are doing well?  Nice house, two cars that are less than three years old each, kids in private school, yearly family vacation.  And then you receive a phone call from a bill collector trying to reach your neighbor.  Suddenly, your perspective changes.  No longer are they your secret envy. .  Your neighbors are in debt and it’s falling apart. 

Most Americans have debt.  It’s bad, and we know it, but we just can’t resist having everything we want.  Maybe our parents didn’t tell us no enough.  Or maybe it was too much.  Either way, we are a consumer-driven economy.  We consume more than we make, both on an industrial level and on an income level.  What is an acceptable portion of your income to devote to debt?  10%?  20%?  What about over 50%?  Most households would be in serious trouble if they spent 50% of their income on debt interest.  That’s when you put the house on the market, enroll the kids in public school, file for bankruptcy, and pray it all comes together before you lose everything.  Depending on where you live, you may have already seen families go through financial crisis.  We will continue to see it until we fix the root problem of material gluttony. 

Spending more than we make is one of the biggest problems facing our nation, from individual households to every level of government.  The City of College Station is no stranger to debt.  Over 50% of the property tax revenue goes towards debt.   The City of College Station is in a dangerous financial situation that needs swift and dramatic action.  We need a City Council that will boldly empower the city staff to make tough decisions, cut spending, and cut projects.  Unfortunately, College Station is on a business as usual path.  We continue to spend.  We continue with expensive parks and projects.  The City of College Station is not taking drastic enough measures to ensure the financial stability of our city and reduce the burden on its residents.

Can you imagine a debt free College Station?  Instead of paying interest on debt, the city could improve services, parks, or roads.  We could reduce the city property tax by half!  More money in your pocket means more to spend in the local economy.  The next time there is a bond election, remember you are voting on adding more debt.  You are voting for higher taxes and fewer services.  You are voting for future instability.

The City Council is the first line of defense when it comes to debt and spending.  We must demand that our council be frugal and make the tough cuts necessary to reduce our debt.  They must put an end to unnecessary bond requests.  We can’t afford everything we want.  Risking our future on non-essentials that do not build our local economy is poor stewardship. 

Jess Fields, candidate for Place 2, is concerned about our amount of debt.  He understands that unpopular decisions must be made, and he’s willing to do that.  Mr. Fields loves College Station and wants to see it grow and prosper.  With an enormous debt burden, not only can College Station not reach its potential, it is at grave risk of financial turmoil.  In May, citizens must elect someone who will take a strong stand on economics in College Station.  We must elect Jess Fields. 



College Station City Council needs a new perspective.  It is littered with nannies who long to control the everyday lives of its citizens.  They desire a uniform community that is healthy, green, and walks in lockstep.  Did you cross the street correctly?  Is the seedling in your front yard in the correct location and the proper diameter?  Did you stop your vehicle behind the white line for at least 3 seconds before turning right on red?  Do all the businesses have matching hedges?  Welcome to College Station, Texas.  In a few years, we’ll all dress like the Cleavers and have a town full of Stepford wives. 

College Station focuses on revenue and appearance. Red Light Cameras, jay-walking tickets, speed traps, and exploding property taxes.  Trees, greenways, brick trimmed sidewalks, and painted overpasses.  In College Station, crime doesn’t pay, so little is done about patrolling areas prone to vehicle burglaries and home invasions.  Catching the crooks costs the city money; whereas, writing tickets to a drunk college students for staggering across the street generates an amazing amount of quick cash.   Our police department is filled with dedicated and honorable men and women who must follow orders.  Instead of serving and protecting, they are babysitting, by order (not choice). 

Government should never be in business.  There is no profit motive because government has an endless stream of money (taxes).  Whether it’s the Postal Service, Medicare, the San Antonio Convention Center, or the Brazos County Expo Center, when government goes into business, it doesn’t profit.  And it rarely breaks even.  If private business sees no value in an endeavor, why would we use tax dollars to take on the failing project?  La Salle Hotel, anyone?  College Station doesn’t have a massive convention center because it is not a profitable endeavor.  We are a smallish city that is not connected by any decent transportation.  Our airport is miniscule with minimal flights to two cities.  There are no interstates here.  When Dell is planning its next big conference, College Station doesn’t come to mind.  This isn’t Field of Dreams.  If you build it, they still won’t come.

Enter Jess Fields.  Finally, someone with common sense.  Mr. Fields is a business owner.  He understands that government can’t magically do what business can’t.  The more regulations you place on businesses, the less they profit.  Failing businesses don’t hire people.  And they don’t pay taxes.  Mr. Fields knows this firsthand.  When his business is doing well, he contributes much to our community.  We need strong, healthy, vibrant businesses in College Station to bring jobs, diversity, and revenue to our city.  Jobs and a variety of businesses will draw new residents to our community.  Two-inch seedlings will not. 

Mr. Fields also recognizes that we cannot continue to ignore the Aggie population.  Many revenue generating programs are targeted at the students.  They are viewed as the city’s cash cow.  Perhaps a new attitude towards the students would help ease the strained relations between the permanent residents and the younger people. 

Communication is a central theme for Jess Fields.  He wants to know what the citizens think.  Unlike some of our current council members, Jess Fields will sincerely listen to residents.  He won’t be condescending or ignore what people have to say.  From his website:

Here are a few specific things that I promise to do to maintain constant communication with my constituents, the people of our community:

  • Twice-a-month town hall meetings either the Wednesday night before, or the weekend after, City Council meetings in order to hear out the concerns of residents on specific issues coming forth on the agenda or being dealt with at the time
  • An e-mail list that I will maintain of any resident that wants to sign up, to inform them of important issues regarding the city council and to solicit feedback regarding issues throughout the city
  • A website where citizens can keep track of what I’m doing on the council, including the ability to comment on issues that I post up
  • I will make every effort to attend as many of your group and organizational meetings as I can in order to ascertain what issues are important to your part of the community

Jess Fields addresses neighborhood issues, including Home Owners Associations, property rights, rental properties, and major developments.  His well thought out platform tackles city debt, property taxes, the convention center, regulations, police and fire salaries, core services, housing affordability, and Northgate.  Mr. Fields is serious about serving you on College Station City Council.  Take the time to read  his website, watch his videos, and meet him.  He deserves your vote.

http://www.jessfields.com/



On March 20, 2010 the Brazos County Republican Party had its county convention.  The two main goals of this convention are to develop a platform to send to the Republican Party of Texas and to nominate delegates and alternate delegates to represent the county at the State Convention.  The general mood of the convention was good.  The hostility that many felt in 2008 had dissipated, as had the number of people in attendance.  The convention was as quick as it could be and orderly.

My first concern was the attendance.  All the county and SD conventions were held on the same day, so I will assume this was dictated at the state level.  Perhaps, the state should realize that Spring Break occurs in March.  Of course, there are still plenty in state and county leadership that are scared to death of those young people (ie anyone under 40).  I hope that the choice of a Spring Break weekend was not an intentional ploy to exclude young people.  If it was, it backfired.  Yes, college students travel on Spring Break.  So do parents and grandparents.  Attendance was pitiful in our county.  Spring Break certainly contributed to the low turnout.  What I wonder is where are all these people who claim to be the grassroots?  They get offended when they are called Astroturf, but they don’t bother to show up for the grassroots process of developing the platform for the Republican Party of Texas.  The convention process isn’t entertaining or glamorous, but it is a necessary evil.  Even if you’re against the two-party system, we still have it.  If we ever do move out of the two-party system, it won’t be anytime soon.  Those who are working within the party system best put some effort into fixing the system.  It will never be perfect, but it could be better.  To all these people complaining about Obama, the Democrats, or even the Republican Party: Show up or Shut up.

The resolutions that formed our county platform were very good for the most part.  The Resolutions Committee seemed open to adding resolutions at the convention as well as making corrections.  Many of our resolutions aimed at steering the Party back to its true conservative roots.  The truth is the Republican Party was far more libertarian than it is today.  The sad thing is that most Republicans today think libertarian means liberal.  They don’t understand that libertarians simply want the government out of their lives, something most Republicans long for.  As author and blogger Jason Mattera said in his speech to the CPAC convention, “Hey jackass, get your government off my freedom!”  That sentiment is held by both Libertarians and Republicans.  Many of our resolutions sought to remove the government from our daily lives, and I applaud that.  The main complaint was that the precinct resolutions were not carefully read.  The Committee steered the resolutions in the direction of their choosing instead of forming the platform based solely on the resolutions from the Precinct Conventions.  I was not on the Resolutions Committee, so I cannot confirm this claim.  If you don’t like the way the resolutions were selected or the resulting platform, now is the time to ask to be on the Resolutions Committee in 2012.

The Nominations Committee was the worst creature by far.  The tradition of giving candidates, elected officials, and judges delegate spots as an honor defeats the purpose of the grassroots process.  They already make decisions in their elected positions.  Why let them co-opt the grassroots process as well?  Many of our top delegates and alternates did not bother to show up to their Precinct Conventions or the County Convention.  They will likely not attend the State Convention either.  The convention process should be reserved for the grassroots to make their voices heard.  Hardworking grassroots activists were pushed out due to these honorary positions.  Brazos County has less of a voice in the RPT now because these “honored” people will likely not show up.  If a candidate or elected official participates in the process and works hard for the Party, then give him the slot.  But if they only show up when it’s time to campaign, they do not deserve the honor of being a delegate or alternate.  The same goes for their spouses.  A percentage of slots should be reserved for those new to the Party.  There will always be people joining in who are eager to get to work.  We need to plug them in immediately.  Don’t tell them to go to luncheons and work their way up.  If they’re ready to work now, put them to work.  We need the energy, and we need the workers!  The application process to be a delegate to the State Convention needs to change as well.  Many people never received an application,  and most received their applications after the slate of delegates and alternates were chosen.  This lack of organization contributes to the belief that our Party is just another Good Ol’ Boy network.  Nothing will change until the existing Party dies out (which will happen sooner than later considering how few young people are allowed to participate).  Candidates should encourage their campaign teams to participate in their Precinct Conventions and hold election watch parties after the Conventions.  Poll workers should be assigned to their own Precincts if possible, to allow their participation in the Precinct Conventions.  Our Precinct Convention did not begin until all the poll workers were finished.  Efforts must be made to allow these faithful volunteers to have a voice in the grassroots process.  If we truly want change in our Party and our nation, we must work diligently to ensure maximum participation.



Your vote is confidential.  I have no way of seeing who voted or email or IP addresses.  
The only data in the results is percentages.
As creator of the poll, I can see number of total votes cast, number of votes in each category, and comments in the "Other" section.

I received a comment that the poll was pointless since you couldn't view live results. If you click "View Results," you will see the current results. If you are checking back, you may need to refresh your page to get the most current results. If you're trying to vote multiple times, there are safeguards in place to prevent this. I know there are some who know how to get around this. Seriously, why bother? Vote once.


The political games the Republican Party plays make me queasy.  The ship sways to the right, “We are conservative!” they shout.  The ship sways to the left as the candidates and elected officials vote.  Back and forth.  Back and forth.  All the while, the grassroots are vomiting over the side. 

Didn’t we dump tea in the water and dress up in costumes very recently?  Did we not carry signs, sign petitions, and call your offices incessantly?  Have you forgotten us already?  Perhaps we should vomit on your shoes instead of politely overboard.  You might notice us then. 

So what has me sick today that I am publishing this rant?  William Flores.  He plopped down his filing fee to run for Congressman in my District, CD17… As a Republican.  Big deal.  Add him to the list, right?  Just another Republican.  Sure, except that he voted in the Democratic Primary in 2008 (according to claims made by Timothy Delasandro).  Not 20 years ago when he was young and naive.  No, last year.  The 2008 primary, when we still had several choices.  Months before we were saddled with John McCain. 

So here’s where I get really nauseated.  Most Republican groups won’t get involved in the primaries (besides secretly excluding candidates that are actually conservative or, God-forbid, libertarian-leaning).  They won’t say a word when someone who voted for Barak or Hilary claims to be your Republican savior.  Oh, but wait, The National Republican Congressional Committee (NRCC) picked Flores.  So they don’t mind inserting themselves into our primary, even though they aren’t from CD17.  Where are our County Chairs?  They have access to Voter Vault.  Why don’t they speak up?  I hope this is on the agenda of the next meeting of each Republican group across CD17.  I know I’ll be bringing it up at Brazos County Young Republicans next meeting.  I hope our County Chairs speak up.  Republican Women.  College Republicans.  Republican Club.  SREC.   Pachyderms.  Raging Elephants.  Republican Liberty Caucus.  Young Republicans.  We need to discuss this, at  a bare minimum.  Political Parties are known for ignoring the obvious until they are forced to deal with it.  Let’s deal with this now.  It’s time that it means something to be a Republican. 

I realize the idea is to let all the Republican candidates duke it out in attack ads and debates.  For the most part, that makes perfect sense.  The Primary is when Republicans have choices, hopefully.  The leadership shouldn’t try to force its will on the people.  However, when it comes to obvious things like voting in the Democratic Primary in the last election, it’s time for our leadership to stand up.  People have different ideas of what it means to be a Republican.  I think most of us can agree that voting in the last Democratic Primary doesn’t fall into the Republican category.  If Flores wants to run against Chet, he should do so in the Democratic Primary, where he voted most recently. 

The idea of the Big Tent doesn’t mean that our candidates do not adhere to some sort of political philosophy.  It means that we welcome anyone who subscribes to the idea of limited government.  Perhaps Flores is seeing the light, and moving towards limited government principles; however, 2008 was a little too recent for this gal.

Hopefully I’m wrong about Mr. Flores.  I really hope I am.



I’ll clarify something quickly.  Kay-Marie Lyles is the best person on the CS City Council.  She happens to be the only woman, but that’s not why she’s the best.  She actually thinks through issues and doesn’t take on the attitude of “the nanny state knows best.”  She truly has a servant’s heart.  I don’t agree with some of her votes, but at least she’s thinking it through.  She seeks outside input and advise.  She listens to the public.  She’s polite.

The six men on the city council have no clue what life in College Station should be.  I’m sure in some alternate universe, they are lovely gentlemen and great neighbors.  Personally, I don’t like anyone who desires to run every aspect of my life.  Here’s a few of their recent accomplishments:

  • Surveillance Cameras at Northgate – didn’t  prevent any crimes, but hey, they can watch the young guys and gals get drunk
  • Tree Ordinance – dictates how fat your trees must be if you build a house.  Don’t like trees?  Deal with it.  On a wooded lot?  Too bad, add more.  Tiny saplings will save the planet.  Al Gore says so.  Besides, they think baby trees are pretty and you should too.
  • Red Light Camera Lawsuit-the most recent crowning achievement of this council.  Not only did they get sued, they declared the election that they approved (meaning it was legal according to the city charter) illegal.  Does the council have the power to declare a past election illegal?  They just decided they have it.  Does it scare you when government grants itself power not given to it?  It should.  Think about the bad governments throughout history.

I could continue, but I’ll spare you the pain.  I’ll publish more later.  Small doses are more tolerable. 

We have a little oligarchy here in College Station.  This elite group thinks they know how best to live your life.  Don’t smoke in the bars because that poor bartender never expected to be exposed to second-hand smoke.   And let’s turn the streets in to giant sidewalks.  That will help businesses grow and create jobs.

There are rumblings of recall.  I’m glad to hear them.  I think they will only get louder, and I look forward to watching these six in the next several months.  They won’t worry about recalls.  They seem to believe that Texans like people telling them what to do on their private property and how to live their lives.



{December 15, 2009}   Eric Finley for CD17

I have known Eric Finley fo most of my life.  He is an honest, trustworthy, and sensible man.

Please explore him on the issues.  You’ll discover he’s the best primary candidate!

http://www.ericfinleyforcongress.com/



et cetera
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 77 other followers

%d bloggers like this: